Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation : (Record no. 81283)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02855pab a2200337 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 161010b2016 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gurram L
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation :
Remainder of title an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Poznań
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Termedia Pub. House
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2016
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 116-121
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Vol. 2 ,no. 8
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Purpose The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports using an open cavity technique. We report the dosimetric indices of open and closed cavity MIB techniques. Material and methods The dosimetric parameters of 60 EBC patients treated with MIB (open and closed cavity) who underwent three dimensional, computerized tomography (CT) based planning for APBI from November 2011 to July 2015 were evaluated. Coverage Index (CI), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Conformity Index (COIN), Plan Quality Index (PQI), and Dose Non-uniformity Index (DNR) were assessed. Results Forty-one patients underwent open cavity and 19 patients underwent closed cavity placement of brachytherapy catheters. The median number of planes was 4 and median number of needles was 20. Median dose was 34 Gy with dose per fraction of 3.4 Gy, given twice a day, 6 hours apart. The D90 of the cavity and clinical target volume (CTV) were 105% and 89%, respectively. The median doses to the surgical clips were greater than 100%. The median CI of the cavity and CTV was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively. The DHI and COIN index of the CTV was 0.73 and 0.67. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters based on whether the technique was done open or closed. Conclusions Critical evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of MIB-APBI is important for optimal results. While the open and closed techniques have similar dosimetry, our institutional preference is for an open technique which eases the procedure due to direct visualization of the tumor cavity.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Location of event implant quality
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Location of event dosimetry
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Location of event breast cancer
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Location of event brachytherapy
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Location of event APBI
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Sarin R
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Paul S
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Phurailatpam R
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Joshi K
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Wadasadawala T
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Place, publisher, and date of publication Poznań : Termedia Pub. House
International Standard Serial Number 1689-832X
Related parts Vol.8, no.2, p.116-121
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier http://10.3.0.2/mm01/Articles/AR17824.pdf
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
h TMH
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
b TMC
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
a Radiation Oncology
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
c 27257415
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
f International
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
e journalArticle
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Tata Memorial Hospital Tata Memorial Hospital 2017-01-19 AR17824 2017-01-19 2017-01-19 Articles

Powered by Koha